M. M. SUNDRESH, A.S. BOPANNA, JJ
MANGILAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under the ndps act due to improper procedure and unreliable witnesses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. statutory compliance for disposal of seized narcotics is mandatory. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
JUDGEMENT
3. Of these witnesses, the public witnesses, namely, P.W.2, P.W.3, P.W.4 and P.W.6 turned hostile. Among them P.W.2 & P.W.6 were panch witnesses. These two witnesses signed majority of the exhibits. P.W.5 though not declared hostile has deposed in clear term that the narcotic substance was in existence at the police station even before the alleged occurrence. This part of the testimony has not been questioned by the prosecution. Both the Courts placed reliance upon the FSL Report along with the police witnesses in rendering convic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.