K. Hymavathi vs The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 13992

A.S. Bopanna, Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ
K. Hymavathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sanchit Garga
For the Respondents: Sidharth Luthra

Table of Content
1. details of the loan agreement and initiation of legal proceedings. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning on determining the enforceability of a debt. (Para 9 , 14)
3. arguments regarding the enforceability of time-barred debts under ni act. (Para 10)
4. final decision to restore the complaints and allow the appeals. (Para 16 , 20)

JUDGEMENT

A.S. Bopanna, J. 1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant is assailing the judgment dated 12.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Andhra Page 1 Digitally signed by Nisha Khulbey Date: 2023.10.11 14:15:15 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified Pradesh at Amravati in Criminal Petition No. 12675 of 2018 and analogous petitions. Through the judgment, the High Court while allowing the petitions before it, quashed the criminal proceedings against Respondent No. 2, being C.C. No.681 of 2017 and analogous complaints on the file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Visakhapatnam. The appellant is the complainant in CC No. 681 of 2017 and the other complaints, filed against the accused – respondent no.2 under Section 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (‘NI Act’ for short). The appellant is therefore before this Court claiming

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 13992

A.S. Bopanna, Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJK. Hymavathi – AppellantVersusThe State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

A.S. Bopanna, Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ
K. Hymavathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. – Respondent