Back
ARAVIND KUMAR, J
N. RAMKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. circumstances leading to the death of sangeetha. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. appellant's contentions against the conviction. (Para 9) |
| 3. evidence evaluation for establishing intention. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. distinction between murder and culpable homicide. (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. legal perspective on intention and knowledge. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. outcome and modifications to the sentencing. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGEMENT
2. This appeal is at the instance of a Convict- Accused and is directed against the judgement and order passed by the Madurai bench of Madras High Court dated 28.10.2015 in Criminal Appeal (MD) No.334 of 2013 whereunder the High Court dismissed Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2023.09.06 16:43:12 IST Reason:
4. The case of the prosecution was that the deceased Sangeetha was in love with the appellant and she was unhappy with the conduct of the appellant and her mother had also warned them in this regard. It is further case of prosecution that deceased stopped seeing the appellant and broke her relationship with the appellant and deceased was talking to her neighbour one Mr. Sudhakar and being agitated with the said turn of events, appellant is said t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
