SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(SC) 830

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, Arun Mishra, JJ
Dr. Kriti Lakhina and Others – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka and Others – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.204 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amrendra Sharan, Mr. Gaurav Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Basavaprabhu S. Patil

Domicile-based eligibility criteria for medical admissions are unconstitutional as they violate the principle of equality under Article 14.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 and Article 32 - Post-Graduate medical and dental admissions - Challenging eligibility criteria for government quota seats based on domicile as arbitrary and unconstitutional - The court finds Clause 4.1 of the Information Bulletin inconsistent with prior judgments, notably Vishal Goyal v. State of Karnataka, rendering it invalid. (Paras 13, 15)

(B) Principle of Equality - The court affirms that candidates who completed MBBS/BDS from Karnataka institutions must not be disqualified based on domicile requirements - Institutional preference is acceptable, but cannot violate equality provisions. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
44 petitioners, having cleared NEET-PG 2018 and completed MBBS/BDS in Karnataka, challenge the domicile clause for Post-Graduate admissions allegedly violating their right to equality under Article 14.

Findings of Court:
The court rules the domicile requirement unconstitutional and mandates modification of eligibility criteria to ensure compliance with equality principles.

Issues: The court addresses the constitutionality of domicile-based admission criteria in medical education.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes that equality must prevail in admissions to higher education without domicile restrictions as seen in past rulings.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; Clause 4.1 declared invalid and unconstitutional.

Table of Content
1. introduction of writ petition and the challenged clause. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claims against domicile-based eligibility criteria. (Para 3 , 4)
3. responses and discussions around eligibility regulations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. affirmation of equality under article 14. (Para 10 , 11)
5. final ruling on the unconstitutionality of the clause. (Para 12 , 13)

Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by 44 Doctors who did their MBBS/BDS Courses from State of Karnataka and have cleared the NEET-PG, 2018 examination with high merit position and are aspiring for admission to Post-Graduate Courses in Karnataka. The principal prayer in the writ petition seeks issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Clause 4 of the Information NEELAM GULATI Date: 2018.04.04 17:09:29 IST Reason: Karnataka and Karnataka Examinations Authority, Government of Karnataka, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 respectively.

2. The Information Bulletin in question lays down, inter alia, conditions for admission to Post-Graduate Medical and Dental Courses in respect of government quota seats in Medical/Dental Colleges in State of Karnataka and was published on the website on 10.03.2018. Relevant portion of Clause 4 of this Information Bulletin deals with eligibility conditions in following terms:

4. ELIGIBILITY

4.1 ELIGIBILITY for Government seats (G) &GMP seats A candidate who fulfills the following criteria is eligible to appear for the online seat allotment process, namely:-

•He/she is a citizen of India, who is of Karnataka Origin and has studied MBBS or BDS degree in a Medical or Dental College situated in Karnataka or outside Karnataka and affiliated to any University established by law in India recognized by Medical Council of India or Dental Council of India and Government of India and has qualified in the NEET (National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test) for admission to post graduate medical or dental degree/diploma courses.

Note: Children for the purpose of the rule means natural born son/daughter and not adopted son/daughter and not grandson/grand daughter.

Explanation: A candidate of Karnataka Origin: means, a candidate found eligible under clause A or B below.

(Clause A)

i) A candidate who has studied and passed in one or more Government or Government recognized, educational institutions located in the State of Karnataka for a minimum period of TEN academic years as on the 31st March, 2018, commencing for 1st standard to MBBS/BDS and must have appeared and passed either SSLC/10th standard or 2nd PUC/12th standard examination from Karnataka State. In case of the candidate who has taken more than one year to pass a class or standard, the year of academic study is counted as one year only (Document to be produced)

(Clause B)

ii) The candidate should have studied and passed 1st and 2nd year Pre-University Examination or 11th or 12th standard examination within the State of Karnataka from an Educational Institution run or recognized by the State Government or MBBS/BDS from a professional educational institution located in Karnataka and that either of the parents must have studied/resided in Karnataka for a minimum period of 10 years. (Documents to be produced)”

3. It is submitted by the petitioners that this Information Bulletin issued by Respondent Nos.2 and 3, to the extent Clause 4.1 thereof imposes a condition of domicile for admission to MD, MS and Post-Graduate Diploma seats in State of Karnataka is invalid and unconstitutional. According to the petitioners said Clause 4.1 arbitrarily and illegally deprives the petitioners who had obtained MBBS/BDS Degrees from the Colleges situated in Karnataka from competing for admission to Post-Graduate Medical/Dental Curses in Government Medical Colleges and against Government quota seats in non-Governmental institutions. Reliance has been placed on the Judgment of this Court in Vishal Goyal and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others, (2014) 11 SCC 456 to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top