Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, Arun Mishra, JJ
Dr. Kriti Lakhina and Others – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of writ petition and the challenged clause. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims against domicile-based eligibility criteria. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. responses and discussions around eligibility regulations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. affirmation of equality under article 14. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling on the unconstitutionality of the clause. (Para 12 , 13) |
Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by 44 Doctors who did their MBBS/BDS Courses from State of Karnataka and have cleared the NEET-PG, 2018 examination with high merit position and are aspiring for admission to Post-Graduate Courses in Karnataka. The principal prayer in the writ petition seeks issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Clause 4 of the Information NEELAM GULATI Date: 2018.04.04 17:09:29 IST Reason: Karnataka and Karnataka Examinations Authority, Government of Karnataka, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 respectively.
2. The Information Bulletin in question lays down, inter alia, conditions for admission to Post-Graduate Medical and Dental Courses in respect of government quota seats in Medical/Dental Colleges in State of Karnataka and was publ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
