SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Online)(SC) 19

SUPREME COURT
S. C. Agrawal, G. T. Nanavati, JJ.
State of Tripura And Others v. Namita Majumdar (Barman) (Smt)


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P. K. Goswami
For the Respondents: Dr. N. M. Ghatate

Table of Content
1. claim to scheduled caste status via marriage. (Para 4 , 5)
2. limitations on claiming scheduled caste benefits. (Para 6)
3. outcome of the appeal and dismissal of the writ. (Para 7)

1. Delay condoned.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. The facts, briefly stated, are that the respondent was born in a forward caste family. She married a person belonging to the Namsudra community which is a Scheduled Caste in the State of Tripura. On 30-4-1975 the respondent submitted an application to the District Magistrate and Collector, West Tripura stating that she belongs to a Scheduled Caste community (Namsudra) and she requested for a certificate certifying the same. On the basis of the averments made by her in the said application, the District Magistrate and Collector, West Tripura, issued a certificate dated 5-5-1975 certifying that the respondent belongs to the Namsudra community which is recognised as a Scheduled Caste. In 1987 the respondent appeared as a Scheduled Caste candidate in the examination conducted by the Tripura Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") for recruitment to the cadre / ex cadre post (junior grade) of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top