Back
SUPREME COURT
*M. Y. Eqbal, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, JJ.
Agarwal R. N. v. R. C. Bansal and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion to quash high court order and restore special judge's decision (Para 1 , 32) |
| 2. formation and illegal takeover of the society (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments challenging the high court's jurisdiction (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. observations on jurisdiction and evidence handling in summoning (Para 8 , 13 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. legal clarity on criminal procedure for summoning accused (Para 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 28) |
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 2.2.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Crl.M.C. Nos.2955 and 3779 of 2009 and Crl.Rev.No. 575 of 2009, whereby the High Court of Delhi while quashing the order dated 10th July, 2009 of the Special Judge, CBI Court Rohini, allowed aforesaid S.482 criminal petitions filed by the alleged culprits and S.397 criminal revision of the Investigating Officer.
3. The brief facts of the case are that in the year 1983, a Society named Maharani Avanti Bai Co - operative Society was formed and from time to time members were enrolled by its Managing Committee. Upto the year 1989 there were 90 members of the Society and thereafter further enrolment of membe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
