SUPREME COURT
, J
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
Animal Welfare Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of notification under pca act (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on repugnancy of 2009 act (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. collision between pca act and 2009 act (Para 18 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. analysis of freedom of religion claims regarding jallikattu (Para 32 , 34 , 36) |
| 5. outcome of review petition (Para 37 , 38) |
1. Review Petition (Civil) No.3769 of 2016 In Civil Appeal No. 5387 of 2014.
Ordinarily, the review petitions are circulated and upon appreciation of the grounds raised therein, they are either dismissed or listed for hearing in the open Court. The present review petition, regard being had to the grounds expounded and the lis in question, has been listed for hearing in open Court to test the defensibility of the arguments propounded on behalf of the State of Tamil Nadu. Be it noted, Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel, at the commencement of hearing, submitted that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the Animal Welfare Board and oppose the prayers sought in the application for review singularly on the ground that this Court while dealing with an application for review does not exercise appellate jurisdiction. Structuring the said edifice he would submit t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.