Back
SUPREME COURT
Unknown, J
Special Land Acquisition Officer KIADB Mysore and Another v. Anasuya Bai (D) by Lrs. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis regarding land acquisition process (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. details of compensation negotiations and disputes (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. writ petition against notifications (Para 10) |
| 4. new la act's applicability and implications (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. arguments regarding consent and compensation processes (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. determination of consent in compensation fixation (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. undisputed facts concerning notifications and repercussions (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. dispute resolution process regarding compensation (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. court's opinion on high court's judgment (Para 23) |
| 10. final judgment and direction for compensation determination (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
1. The question of law that has been raised in this appeal by the appellants, for consideration by this Court, is:
Whether provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short, "New LA Act"), are applicable in the instant case when the land is acquired under the provisions of KIAD Act?
2. Factual narration that is required to be noted, giving rise to the aforesaid question of law, is stated hereinbelow:
Respondents is th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
