Back
SUPREME COURT
Dinesh Maheshwari, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ.
State of Tripura v. Rina Purkayashta
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeals against a high court ruling. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. determination of retirement age under the icds scheme. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. central government guidelines and state policy consideration. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. nature of state responsibilities under funded schemes. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's ruling on policy discretion and appeals outcome. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals by the State of Tripura are directed against the common judgment and order dated 29.06.2021 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Tripura in four connected intra - court appeals led by WA No. 173 of 2021 whereby, Division Bench has affirmed the judgment and order dated 10.03.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in a batch of respective writ petitions led by WP(C) No. 886 of 2019.
3. By the impugned judgment and order dated 10.03.2021, the learned Single Judge held that the Anganwadi Workers / Anganwadi Helpers ('AWs' / 'AHs') engaged by the appellant - State under the Integrated Child Development Services Scheme ('ICDS') were entitled to be continued in their engagement until attaining the age of 65 years against the existing policy of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
