SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10625

SUPREME COURT
A, J
Rajnish Singh @ Soni v. State of UP


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. A
For the Respondents: State Counsel

Table of Content
1. allegations of prolonged sexual relationship under duress. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments for voluntary relationship and marriage promise. (Para 13 , 14)
3. court evidences about consent and nature of the relationship. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 30)
4. definition of consent and criminal liability. (Para 26 , 27 , 34)
5. court decision to quash proceedings. (Para 39 , 40)

1. Heard.

3. The appellant herein has preferred the instant appeal by special leave, assailing the order dated 24th April, 2023, passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hereinafter, referred to as 'High Court') dismissing the petition filed by the appellant, being Application U/S 482 No. 43177 of 2022, for quashment of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1246 of 2022 arising out of chargesheet in Case Crime No. 269 of 2022 under S.376, S.384, S.323, S.504, S.506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter, being referred to as ' IPC ') at Police Station Bakewar, District Etawah.

5. Ms. A, respondent No. 2 - complainant (For short, 'complainant'), lodged an FIR in Case Crime No. 269 of 2022 dated 5th July, 2022, against the appellant at Police Station Bakewa



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top