SUPREME COURT
, CJ
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others v. M/s Raja Transport (P) Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. leave granted for appeal against appointment of arbitrator. (Para 1) |
| 2. background of dispute concerning dealership termination and arbitration clause. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. rival contentions regarding arbitrator appointment. (Para 8) |
| 4. validity of appointing employee as arbitrator discussed. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. differentiation of old and new act provisions on arbitrator independence. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. no bar for employee arbitrator in state contracts. (Para 13) |
| 7. conditions for apprehension of bias in employee arbitrators. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. calls for reconsideration of employee arbitrators in light of bias concerns. (Para 16) |
| 9. procedural requirements for appointing arbitrators outlined. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 10. respondent's failure to act under arbitration agreement discussed. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 11. invalid demand for independent arbitrator against arbitration agreement. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 12. final decision to reverse previous order and appoint named arbitrator. (Para 24 , 25) |
1. Leave granted. This appeal by special leave is filed against the order dated 26.9.2008 of the learned Chief Justice of the Uttaranchal High Court, in a petition filed by the respondent herein, u
Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Puri v. Gangaram Chhapolia
Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Madras v. Munuswamy Mudaliar
International Authority of India v. K. D. Bali and Another
M/s. Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals v. M/s. Indo - Swiss Synthetics Germ Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Ace Pipeline Contract Pvt. Ltd. v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.