A.K.MATHUR, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Ace Pipeline Contracts Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
A.K.MATHUR, J.
Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.1.2006 passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi in Arbitration Petition No.181 of 2005 whereby learned Single Judge dismissed the application for appointment of Arbitrator. Hence, the
present appeal against the aforesaid order.
Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this appeal are that an application styled under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was moved by the Ace Pipeline Contracts Private Limited, the appellant herein, for appointing a retired Judge of the Supreme Court of India to adjudicate the claims and disputes between the parties arising out of the contract between the parties dated 10.06.2002. The said contract pertained to the laying down of a pipeline and associated facilities for Section-1 [Manmad in Maharashtra to M.P. Border near (Shirpur)] for Mumbai-Manmad Pipeline Extension Project of the respondent- Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as BPCL). The main issue was with regard to interpretation of Clause 91 of the contract which pertains to appointment of arbitr
Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Calcutta
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. v. Babu Ram Upadhya
Datar Switchgears Ltd. v. Tata Finance Ltd and Anr.
Shin Satellite Public Co.Ltd. v. Jain Studios Ltd.
Union of India and Anr. v. M.P.Gupta
Referred to : BSNL and Ors. v. Subash Chandra Kanchan and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.