Back
SUPREME COURT
S. K. Seth, J
Rini Johar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background details of the petitioners and initial transactions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. description of the arrests and complaints filed against petitioners. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. details regarding the orders and provision for discharge. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. discussion on legality of arrest and procedural violations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. discussion of systemic flaws in arrest procedures. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. arguments on compliance of arrest guidelines. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. court views on dignity and mandatory procedural adherence. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. compensation for violation of rights during arrest. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. court's rationale for quashing criminal proceedings. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. final ruling allowing the writ petition. (Para 30) |
1. The petitioner no. 1 is a doctor and she is presently pursuing higher studies in United States of America (USA). She runs an NGO meant to provide services for South Asian Abused Women in USA. Petitioner no. 2, a septuagenarian lady, is a practicing Advocate in the District Court at Pune for last 36 years. Petitioner no. 1 is associated with M/s. Progen, a US company.
3. The informant visited the petitioner no. 1 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
