J.K. Maheshwari, Atul S. Chandurkar, JJ
Himakshi – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Verma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding recruitment eligibility and high court proceedings. (Para 1) |
J U D G M E N T J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.
1. The present appeals relate to recruitment to the post of Computer Hardware Engineer by respondent no. 2 – Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education (hereinafter “the Board”). The Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by controversy centres around the prescribed qualifications for NIDHI AHUJA Date: 2026.04.20 Reason:
appointment to the said post, particularly the requirement of prior work experience and the preference, if any, to a higher qualification, such as a Master’s degree.
2. These appeals emanate from the common impugned judgement dated 23.04.2021 (hereinafter “Impugned Judgement”) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla (hereinafter “High Court”), whereby the judgement of the Single Judge of the High Court was set aside. The Division Bench held that neither the appellant Himakshi (hereinafter “selected candidate”) nor the respondent no. 1 – Rahul (hereinafter “unsuccessful candidate”) satisfied the essential qualifications at the time of recruitment and appointment.
3. At its core, the question


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.