Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ
S. Anand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to the quashing petition. (Para 3) |
O R D E R
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. Leave granted.
3. The appellant seeks to assail the common order dated 11th August, 2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, NEETU KHAJURIA 1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘High Court’ whereby, Crl.OP (MD) No. 10902 of 2019, preferred by the appellant under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Digitally signed by came to be dismissed. By way of the said petition, the appellant had sought to call for the records of Signature Not Verified Date: 2026.04.27
1 R 9 e : a 0 s 4 o :2 n :
IST
Criminal Case No.419 of 2018 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur, and to quash the proceedings thereof.
4. Respondent No.2-complainant lodged a complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Karur District, alleging inter alia that his father, Ayyasamy Nadar, died on 19th September, 1988. His elder brother, Balakrishnan, had died about one year prior thereto. It was alleged that Ayyasamy Nadar had executed a partition deed dated 2nd December, 1959, under which the ‘A’ Schedule property was allotted to respondent No.2-complainant and, aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.