J U D G M E N T

SANJAY KUMAR, J 1. Leave granted.

2. During the arbitral proceedings between the parties, a fundamental legal aspect came to be glossed over on a patent misunderstanding of a decision of this Court. Hence, this order, to clarify the legal position.

3. Arbitration commenced between the parties upon appointment of a sole Arbitrator by the Delhi High Court in the context of the disputes arising under their Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 02.03.2006 read with the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 05.05.2008 of the respondent, M/s. Construction Industry Development Council, with Signature Not Verified Employment Generation and Marketing Mission, Department of Rural babita pandey Date: 2026.04.28 Reason:

Development, Government of Andhra Pradesh.

4. The appellant, M/s. MCM Worldwide Private Limited, had earlier filed a suit in CS DJ No. 428 of 2018 for recovery of its alleged dues before the learned District & Session Judge, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, but the respondent filed an application therein under Sectio