Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Nagesh.C.Kumbre, Member, Dr.Nisha.A.Chavhan, Member, Milind.S.Sonawane, Presiding Member
The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dinkar Ranjaji Narwade – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition filed under c.p.a. section 47. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing of advocates for both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. limitation period for written statement emphasized. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. no extension beyond limitation as per previous rulings. (Para 6) |
| 5. final ruling on the merit of the petition is discussed. (Para 7) |
Dr.Nisha.A.Chavhan, Hon’ble Member, Nagesh.C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member J U D G M E N T Per Nagesh.C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member.
1. This revision petition has been preferred under Section 47 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (in short, the C.P.A.) against the order dated 11.12.2023 passed by the District Commission Aurangabad, (in short, the District Commission) rejecting the application of revision petitioner with a prayer to accept its written statement on record in consumer complaint C.C.No. 613/2023.
2. The facts relevant for the disposal of the present revision petition are that, the Consumer Complaint C.C. No. 613/2023 under section 35 of the C.P.A. was filed by present respondent no.1, who is original complainant wherein present revision petitioner is opponent no.1 and respondent no.2 is opponent no.2 before the District Commission. The complaint w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
