Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, President
Dr. R.S. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar Mehta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the appeal and its dismissal due to lack of merit. (Para 1 , 10 , 22) |
| 2. factual background depicting the patient's treatment journey and resultant issues. (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. arguments presented by both sides regarding negligence and treatment adequacy. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's observations on medical standards and implications of negligence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. specific failures cited related to the appellant's obligations in treatment. (Para 18 , 21) |
Order
Dated:- 05.05.2025
Per; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar, President
1. Present appeal has been filed on behalf of appellant/opposite party for setting aside the judgment and order dated 26.10.2010 passed by the learned District Consumer Forum, Aurangabad in complaint case no.22 of 2008 whereby and where under complaint case has been allowed.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case is that son of complainant Sunil Kumar Mehta suffered and accidental injury on 14.11.2007 at about 9:00PM from a Scooter near Sinha College turning while he was going to his friends house to give Chhath Prasad. As soon as complainant got its information he took his son to the clinic of Dr. R.S. Gupta on the sam
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
