Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Raheesh Kumar Arya, Presiding Member, Preetinder Singh, Member
Keshav Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Credo Assets Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against builders regarding unfulfilled contractual obligations. (Para 1 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. opponents argue against the jurisdiction and the consumer relationship. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. court assesses jurisdiction and consumer status post possession. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court orders compliance with obligations and refunds due to deficiencies. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH
| Complaint No. | : | 92 of 2024 |
| Date of Institution | : | 23.09.2024 |
| Date of Decision | : | 26.05.2025 |
Keshav Bansal, aged 34 years S/o Sh. Sushil Kumar, Resident of Flat No.2262, 2nd Floor Tower/Block No.COD 14, City of Dreams 2, Sector 116, Landran Kharar Road, Kharar, SAS Nagar, Punjab – 140301.
….Complainant.
Versus
1] CREDO Assets Pvt. Ltd., through its Managing Director/Director, Earlier Address: Registered and st Corporate Office at SCO No.146, 147 & 148, 1 Floor, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh – 160043.-
2] M/s Singla Builders and Promoters Pvt. Ltd., through its Directors, Plot No.1265C, Near Tata Motors, Sector 82, Industrial Area, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab – 140308.
…..Opposite Parties.
| Complaint No. | : | 93 of 2023 |
| Date of Institution | : | 23.09.2024 |
| Date of Decision | : | 26.0 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
