SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Sikk) 7

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Robin Gurung – Appellant
Versus
State Of Sikkim – Respondent


Advocates:
['Ms Gita Bista', '', 'Ms MONIKA RAI', 'Ms Pollin Rai', 'Asst Public Prosecutor']

JUDGMENT 

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Order on Sentence, dated 30-09-2016, of the Learned Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012), South Sikkim, at Namchi, in Sessions Trial (POCSO) Case No.21 of 2015, State of Sikkim vs. Robin Gurung, the instant Appeal has been preferred.

2. Vide the impugned Judgment, the Appellant was convicted of the offences charged with and sentenced as follows;

(i) for the offence under Sections 5(l)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “POCSO Act”), to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand), only.

(ii) for the offence under Section 376(2)(i) and (n) of the IPC, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand), only.

(iii) for the offence dated 29-08-2015, under Section 354B of the IPC,, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand), only.

(iv) for the offence dated 01-09-2015, under Section 354B of the IPC, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- (Rupe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top