HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SUJANA, J
Jyothi Raju – Appellant
Versus
Vital Radha Krishna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of tenancy and eviction (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial court's ruling on maintainability (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. court's reasoning on eviction (Para 18) |
| 4. civil revision petition outcome (Para 19) |
ORDER:
Challenging the order dated 11.03.2024 passed in E.A.No.152 of 2023 in E.P.No.216 of 2023 in O.S.No.1485 of 2002 by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent, a judgment debtor, filed a petition, vide E.A.No.152 of 2023, under Section 47 read with 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, challenging the maintainability of the execution petition filed by the decree holder. The firm of the respondent, M/s. Srinivasa Steel Traders and Hardware, was a tenant in a property, and a suit was filed by the father of the decree holder for eviction. The matter was settled through a compromise, and a registered lease deed was executed for 15 years. The respondent claimed that the terms of the compromise had been fully discharged, and the contract of tenancy had merged into the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.