Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J
M/s. Rayudu Visions Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek writs against revocation of channel permissions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner argues violations relate to older guidelines. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court reviews procedural compliance and violations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. show cause notices reveal multiple violations by petitioner. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. cancellation of permission based on established violations. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. judicial review limited to procedural fairness, not merits. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. administrative decisions subject to judicial review under article 226. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. writ petitions dismissed; compliance with guidelines encouraged. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
COMMON ORDER:
As the parties in both these writ petitions are one and the same and the issue involved is intrinsically interconnected, these writ petitions are taken up, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Writ Petition No.6732 of 2024, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
“….to Issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order against the Respondent, declaring the Order vi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
