Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.L. Dattu, CJI A.K. Sikri and Arun Mishra, JJ.
Modern Dental College & Research Centre and others - Applicants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
I.A. Nos. 67-68 and 73-79 in Civil Appeal No. 4060 of 2009
Decided On : 12-02-2015
Interim Order - Extension for Academic Session - The court extended the interim order dated 27.05.2009 as clarified by the order dated 03.04.2012 for the academic session 2015-2016.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought the extension of the interim order for the academic session 2015-2016.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted the extension of the interim order for the academic session 2015-2016 based on the submission made by the applicant's counsel.
Issues: Extension of Interim Order
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to extend the interim order for the academic session 2015-2016 based on the submission made by the applicant's counsel and the absence of objection from the other party.
Final Decision: I.A. Nos. 77-78 and I.A. No. 79 were disposed of, I.A. Nos.73-74 and I.A. Nos.75-76 were dismissed, and I.A. Nos. 67-68 were listed along with the main matter.
ORDER :
I.A. Nos. 77-78 and I.A. No. 79
By these applications, applicant(s) seek the following relief :
2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant(s) submits that the other side has no objection if the interim order dated 27.05.2009 as clarified by the order dated 03.04.2012 made by this Hon'ble Court is extended for the academic session 2015-2016.
3. In view of the submission so made by learned counsel for the applicants, we direct that the interim order passed on 27.05.2009 as clarified by order dated 03.04.2012 shall continue for the academic year 2015-2016.
4. I.A. Nos.77-78 and I.A. No. 79 stand disposed of.
I.A. Nos. 73-74 and I.A. Nos.75-76
Dismissed.
I.A. Nos. 67-68
List these applications along with the main matter.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
