Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
JUSTICE, J
P.Srividya – Appellant
Versus
Ponnala Vaishali – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property ownership and disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's analysis of evidence and legal principles. (Para 8 , 9 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. arguments regarding title and possession of property. (Para 10 , 11 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. principles regarding bona fide purchasers and discrepancies in boundaries. (Para 35 , 40 , 42) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeals confirming lower court decisions. (Para 45) |
COMMON JUDGMENT:
These appeals are filed against the Common Judgment and decree dated 10.10.2022 in A.S.Nos.11 and 12 of 2009 passed by the learned II-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy, in which the Judgment and decree dated 30.12.2008 in O.S.Nos.76 & 90 of 2003, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, was confirmed.
2. Parties herein are referred as plaintiffs and defendant as arrayed before the trial Court in O.S.Nos.76 and 90 of 2003.
3. The brief facts of the case are that initially one P.Sri Vidya and P.Karthik filed separate suits vide O.S.No.76 and 90 of 2003 against one Arjula @ Ponnala Vaishali, for declaration of title and for consequential recovery of possession and for correction of entries in the revenue records in respect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
