Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
Petitioner/Third Party – Appellant
Versus
Respondent No.1 – State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. custody of seized animals must prioritize their welfare. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 2. arguments for maintaining animal custody based on potential cruelty. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. statutory regulations govern animal custody and treatment. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. court emphasized that welfare considerations must guide custody decisions. (Para 13) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/third party against the order dated 27.02.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.27 of 2025 in Cr.No.27 of 2025 of by the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Asifabad.
2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent Nos.2 and 3/owners of the buffaloes filed a petition under Section 503 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) seeking release of the property i.e, 09 bulls from respondent No.2 and 11 bulls from respondent No.3 total 20 bulls which worth of Rs.2,50,000/- which was seized in Cr.No.27 of 2025. The trial Court after hearing both sides, vide order dated 27.02.2025 allowed the petition and the property was returned to the owner of the property. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed the present criminal petition.
3.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
