Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, JJ
Wife – Appellant
Versus
Husband – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of marriage and dissolution grounds. (Para 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. claims for alimony and dowry post-divorce. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. appellant's delay in filing impacts ruling. (Para 9 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. observations on the impact of unchallenged decree and respondent's responsibilities. (Para 11 , 15) |
| 5. legal provisions under hindu marriage act regarding maintenance. (Para 13) |
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO F.C.A.NO.48 OF 2014 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)
Challenging the order dated 17.02.2014 in F.C.O.P.No.98 of
2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court – Cum – Additional District and Sessions Judge at Karimnagar, appellant preferred the present Appeal.
2. Appellant is the wife and respondent is the husband.
3. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was performed on 29.05.1986. It is an arranged marriage. According to the appellant, the said marriage was consummated. However, there were no issues out of the said wedlock. Thereafter, disputes arose between them. It is the specific contention of the appellant herein that her parents and parents of the respondent agreed to get second marriage of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
