Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T. VINOD KUMAR, J
Bharat Educational society Bharat voluntary organization – Appellant
Versus
K. Anjaneyulu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of civil revision petition and procedural dynamics. (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner applied to be impleaded as necessary party. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. trial court dismissed based on prior relief granted. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments presented regarding necessity for impleadment. (Para 6) |
| 5. law on necessary parties discussed. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. sub-lessee rights not recognized post lease termination. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. revision petition dismissed, trial court's order upheld. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 30.11.2023 in E.A.No.54 of 2023 in E.P. No. 703 of 2022 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge Medchal Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda.
2. The revision petitioner herein is the petitioner in the underlying execution application seeking to come on record as necessary party in the main E.P.
3. The respondent No.1 herein filed the above execution petition as decree holder seeking issuance of warrant for delivery of the vacant possession of suit schedule property after evicting the respondent/judgement debtor and his family members vide E.P. No. 703 of 2022 under Order
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
