SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68776

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
State of Telangana and 2 others – Appellant
Versus
Sri V.Madan and another – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA C.C.C.A.NO.72 of 2020

JUDGMENT:

This City Civil Court Appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Section 96 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree, dated 02.04.2019 passed in O.S.No.11 of 2016 on the file of the VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein the suit filed by respondent No.1/

plaintiff was decreed.

2. Appellants are defendant Nos.1 to 3; respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent No.2 is defendant No.4 before the trial Court. For the sake of convenience the parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed before the trial Court in O.S.No.11 of 2016.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed the above declaration suit seeking to declare that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property ie. house bearing No.1-3-448/13 to an extent of 120 square yards, situated at Kavadiguda, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “the suit property”); to grant mandatory and permanent injunction directing the defendants to remove the board installed by them and to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit property.

4. It is stated that the pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top