IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
Gadeela Raghuveer Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 1844/2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1844 of 2026 Between :
Gadeela Raghuveer Reddy S/o.Gadeela Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 40 years, R/o.H.No.3-11, Kondapaka, Siddipet, Telangana ….Petitioner/Accused No.1 VERSUS The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Through Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, Telangana and another … Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 03.03.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO 1. Whether Reporters of Local Yes/No newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may Yes/No be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?
3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish Yes/No to see the fair copy of the Judgment?
_______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO + CRIMINAL PETITION No.1844 of 2026 % Dated 03.03.2026 # Gadeela Raghuveer Reddy S/o.Gadeela Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 40 years, R/o.H.No.3-11, Kondapaka, Siddipet, Telangana ….Petitioner/Accused No.1 VERSUS $ The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Through Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, Telangana and another … Respondents ! Counsel for Petitioner : Mr.M. Pratheek Reddy ^ Counsel for Respondents : Mr. Jithender Rao Veeamalla Learned Additional Public Prosecutor (R.1)
Mr. N. Krishna Kumar (R.2)
GIST:
> HEAD NOTE:
? CITATIONS:
1. (2015) 7 SCC 423
2. 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2894
3. (2017) 2 SCC 779
4. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
5. (2025) 10 SCC 638
6. 1959 SCC OnLine SC 43
7. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
8. (2021) 19 SCC 401 9. (2024) 10 SCC 527 10. (2014) 15 SCC 221
11. (2000) 3 SCC 269
12. 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1951
13. (2026) 1 SCC 721 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1844 of 2026 DATE: 03.03.2026 Between :
Gadeela Raghuveer Reddy ....Petitioners/Accused No.1 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Through Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, Telangana and another ....Respondents : O R D E R :
This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.108 of 2026 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 308(3) and 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNS’).
2. Brief facts of the case Respondent No.2 lodged a complaint on 05.02.202 before the Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station, stating that he is in occupation of property bearing Municipal No. 8-2-686/22 admeasuring about 1000 square yards at NBT Nagar, Banjara Hills, Road No.12, Hyderabad, since 1992, while his sister, Mrs. Kavitha Rao, is in occupation of the adjoining property bearing Municipal No. 8-2-686/21 admeasuring about 425 square yards. Conveyance Deeds bearing Document Nos. 3942 of 2023 and 3941 of 2023, both dated 12.06.2023, were executed in their favour. The petitioner, who has no right, title, or interest in the said properties, filed W.P. (PIL) No. 26 of 2024 before the Hon’ble High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, challenging the regularization and execution of the said conveyance deeds on the ground that the Government had allegedly charged lower rates, causing loss to the exchequer. After the Hon’ble High Court ordered notices on 23.07.2024, the petitioner allegedly contacted him through multiple WhatsApp calls and messages, forwarded newspaper clippings relating to the PIL, and indicated that he would withdraw the case if paid a substantial amount. When the same was informed to his younger brother, Mr. K. Viplav Kumar, the latter contacted the petitioner, who allegedly threatened to file further writ petitions if not “handled smoothly” and directed him to speak with one Mr. Anvesh Reddy, who is his cousin. Mr. Anvesh Reddy allegedly conveyed a demand of Rs. 3,00,00,000/- in cash for withdrawal of the PIL and issuance of a No Objection Certificate (NOC). The Wh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.