Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Juvvadi Sridevi, J
Azmeera Kailas – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature and background of the pc act prosecution. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's contentions on delay and exoneration vs. state's rebuttals. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evaluation of delay in sanction and judicial review. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. standard for challenging administrative sanction validity. (Para 9) |
| 5. independence of departmental exoneration versus criminal trial proceedings. (Para 10) |
| 6. final order and mandate for expeditious trial completion. (Para 11) |
: O R D E R :
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (previously Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) by the petitioner-accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.39 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Hyderabad (for short ‘trial Court’), registered for the offences under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short the ‘Act’).
2. Heard Mr. C.Pratap Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. C.Sunil Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.Balamohan Reddy, learned Special Public Prosecutor for ACB appearing for responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
