IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN,THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Pabba Murali – Appellant
Versus
Ramakishore Mundada – Respondent
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO APPEAL SUIT NO.103 OF 2026 DATED: 31.03.2026 Pabba Murali … Appellant – Claim Petitioner – Defendant No.2 Vs.
1.Ramakishore Mundada … Respondent No.1 – decree holder - Plaintiff
2.Jilla Srinivas … Respondent No.2-JDR No.1 – Defendant No.1
JUDGMENT
(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.LAKSHMAN)
1. Heard Sri R.A.Chary, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Damodar Mundra, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Bethi Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
2. This Appeal is preferred under Section 96 of CPC, challenging the order dated 22.12.2025 in E.A.No.154 of 2023 in E.P.No.11 of 2022 in O.S.No.211 of 2014, passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Karimnagar.
3. Respondent No.1 – plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.211 of 2014 initially against respondent No.2 – defendant No.1 for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,46,02,083/-. Along with the said suit, respondent No.1 - plaintiff has also filed an Interlocutory Application vide I.A.No.825 of 2014 under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of CPC seeking attachment before judgment. The same was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.