Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be utilized to adjudicate complex questions of title or private civil rights that require trial-level evidence; such matters must be resolved before competent civil courts. An order of status quo on revenue entries does not nullify independent administrative statutory actions.

ORDER :

Initially the first petitioner filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to declare the NALA orders issued by respondent No.5 in respect of land situated in Sy.No.109/1, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use, namely Proceedings Nos. 2101066510 dated 22.12.2021 (Ac.1-09½ gts.), 2101066645 dated 21.12.2021 (Ac.1-10 gts.), 2101066955 dated 21.12.2021 (Ac.1-23 gts.), 2101112979 dated 22.04.2022 (Ac.4-25 gts.), 3300034986 dated 01.02.2023 (Ac.1-12½ gts., and Ac.1-07 gts.) and 2101111076 dated 01.02.2023 (Ac.1-10 gts.), as illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice, contrary to Act 4 of 1999 and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, besides being vitiated by fraud and misrepresentation and consequently set aside the same, further suspend the operation of the said NALA orders dated 21.12.2021, 22.04.2022 and 01.02.2023 issued pursuant to the orders of this Hon’ble Court in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.12470 of 2019 dated 20.08.2019 and I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.10620 of 2020 dated 07.08.2020, while directing the authorities not to give effect thereto pending disposal of the main writ petition. A further direction was also sought to Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to mutate the name of the Petitioner by rectifying the revenue records and restrain the Respondents from issuing any orders or proceedings in favour of third parties in respect of land admeasuring Ac.19-08 gts in Sy.No.109/1, Ac.5-21 gts in Sy.No.112/3 and Ac. 2-35 gts in Sy.No.134, situated at Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, belonging to the Petitioner.

2. Heard Sri Surya Balu Mahendra, learned Senior Counsel for the 1st petitioner, Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the 2nd petitioner, Sri P.Sree Raghu Ram, learned senior counsel, representing Sri TH Ramakrushnom, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.7 and 8, Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, learned senior counsel representing Sri B.Venkateswara Reddy & DV Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos.9 and 10, Sri SVS Prasada Rao, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.11 and 12 and also Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of Government Pleader for Revenue Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy.

3. The case of the 1st petitioner, in brief, is that he along with his sister is the absolute owner of land admeasuring Ac.19-08 Gts., in Survey No.109/1 of Kondapur Village and other adjoining lands, having inherited the same from his father late M.V.Raghavaiah. The petitioner's father purchased the subject property under a registered sale deed dated 02.12.1959 from one Vazheeruddin Ahmed and his title was further confirmed under a final decree dated 24.12.1969 in O.S.No.62 of 1963, on the file of the learned Munsiff Magistrate, West, Hyderabad. Upon the demise of his father on 26.03.1977, the property devolved upon the petitioner, his mother Smt.Anjamma and his sister being the class-I legal heirs. During her lifetime, Smt.Anjamma executed a Will dated 06.01.1990 and a Codicil dated 15.01.2003 in favour of the petitioner. After her death on 30.03.2003, the petitioner claims to have succeeded to her share as well and thus asserts lawful title by way of registered conveyance and succession.

(a) It is the further case of the 1st petitioner that in