SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 171

SANJAY KAROL, SANJAY KUMAR
Savitri Bai – Appellant
Versus
Savitri Bai – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR, J.

1. Civil Suit No. 22A/80 was dismissed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Class-1, Mudwara Katni, vide judgment dated 21.12.1992. The same stood confirmed in appeal by the learned First Additional District Judge, Mudwara Katni, when Civil Appeal No. 1A/1993 filed by the plaintiff was dismissed on 14.03.1997. However, Second Appeal No. 395 of 1997 filed by the said plaintiff was allowed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur on 28.07.2011. Thereby, the High Court declared that the plaintiff was the owner of the suit house property under the registered Sale Deed dated 18.01.1979 and decreed its possession in her favour. Further, the High Court declared the Will dated 23.03.1977 executed in favour of Meghraj, the second defendant, null and void. Aggrieved thereby, the defendants in the suit filed this appeal.

2. By order dated 28.11.2011, this Court directed both parties to maintain status quo prevailing as on that date. On 30.09.2013, the interim order was directed to continue till the final disposal of the appeal.

3. Parties shall hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

4. Late Babulal Kahar had two wives. Savitri Bai, the first defenda

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top