SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12530

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
P. Sreekanth Sreekanth Pannala – Appellant
Versus
Shri B. Ramesh Babu and another – Respondent


HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Nos. 278 of 2022 Date: 08.04.2026 Between:

P. Sreekanth …. Appellant AND B. Ramesh Babu and another …. Respondents

JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred under Order XLIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the Appellant, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2022 passed in A.S.No.166 of 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “impugned Judgment on the file of the learned III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the learned Appellate Court”). By the said Impugned Judgment, the learned Appellate Court has set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 11.04.2017 passed in O.S. No. 1144 of 2014 on the file of the learned IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the learned Trial Court”) has remanded the suit to the learned Trial Court for fresh adjudication.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein, are referred to as per their status before the learned Trial Court.

I. BRIEF FACTS

3. The factual backdrop to the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is as follows:

a) The appellant/plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top