IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN,THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
N.P. Vijaya Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Atul P Desai – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION N os . 783, 785 AND 894 OF 2026 Date: 17-04-2026 Between in CRP No.783 of 2026 N.P.Vijayalakshmi and two others ….Petitioners and Atul P Desai and others .....Respondents T his Court passed the following COMMON ORDER (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)
Since the parties and the lis involved in these revisions are one and the same, these revisions are heard together and being disposed of by the common order.
2. Heard Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners in all the revisions and Sri R.Sushanth Reddy, learned counsel for respondents in CRP No.783 of 2026 and respondent No.1 in CRP Nos.785 and 894 of 2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo vide USR No.35471 of 2026 dated 18.03.2026 in CRP No.783 of 2026 stating that 3rd respondent is also a Judgment Debtor, she stands on the same footing as that of the petitioners, since she is residing in Australia, and they could get her vakalath in time. Therefore, she is only a formal party. Therefore, petitioners are not seeking any relief against her.
4. L
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.