Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. Shravan Kumar, J
A. Manik Prabhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner complains of unauthorized neighbor construction and municipal inaction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. courts must strictly adhere to municipal planning laws and avoid regularizing illegal structures. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. direction to municipal and police authorities to act according to statutory provisions. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for MA&UD appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri.Midde Arun Kumar, learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent No.5. With their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition has being filed seeking the following prayer:-
“to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, Declaring the continued inaction and failure of the Respondent No.2 to 5 to act on the complaints of the Petitioner and not stopping the illegal and unauthorised construction on the property bearing H.No.13-2-443 and 443/1, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad despite of issuance of a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
