SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan, JJ.
Rajendra Kumar Barjatya And Another – Appellants
Versus
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 14604 of 2024 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.36440 of 2014)
With
Rajeev Gupta And Others – Appellants
Versus
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 14605 of 2024 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.1184 of 2015)
Decided On : 17-12-2024
JUDGMENT :
(R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenging the final judgment and order dated 05.12.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1[Hereinafter shortly referred to as “the High Court”] in Writ-C.No.46342 of 2013, the appellants herein, who are third parties to the proceedings, have preferred the present appeals.
3. The aforesaid writ petition was filed by the Respondent No.1 seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to stop the illegal/unauthorized commercial construction on residential plot no.661/6, Shastri Nagar Yojna No.7, Meerut, and to provide police force to execute the order of demolition dated 31.05.2011 passed by the competent authority viz., Executive Engineer, Construction Division-8, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Sector 9, Shastri Nagar, Meerut.
4. By the judgment and order impugned herein, the High Court allowed the above writ petition with the following directions and observations:
(b) Criminal proceedings should be launched against respondent nos.4 and 5 as well as against the officers, who were In-charge of the office of Awas Vikas Parishad at the relevant time including the Chief Engineer and the Executive Engineer when these constructions had come up.
(c) The Chief Secretary, U.P. Lucknow shall ensure that the departmental proceedings are also initiated against the officers of Awas Evam Vikas Parishad responsible for the situation, which has been created. The Housing Commissioner shall also ensure that all like nature of unauthorized constructions are similarly dealt with without any discrimination and without any favourtism. For the purpose, he shall ensure that the highest officer posted in the office of Awas Evam Vikas Parishad at Meerut is made personally responsible for giving notice to the owner/persons in possession of the unauthorized occupations. The proceedings must be decided and appropriate action be taken within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. There should be no complaint to this Court that any person has been treated favourably in the matter of demolition of the unauthorized constructions.
(d) We also direct the Chief Secretary, U.P. Lucknow to ensure that the district authorities at Meerut are responded to the request of Awas Evam Vikas Parishad in the matter of demolition with all promptness and with full force.
(e) We make it clear that all unauthorized constructions have to be dealt with in same manner.”
5. At the outset, it is imperative to note the relevant background facts leading to the present litigation. The Respondent No.5 by name, Veer Singh was originally allotted a plot bearing No.661/6, situated in Bhoomi Vikas, Grisathan Yojna No.7, Sector No.6, Phase-1, Shastri Nagar, Meerut, U.P.2[Hereinafter shortly referred to as the “subject property”] by the Respondent No.1 on 30.08.1986. Possession was also handed over to him on 15.06.1989. In respect of the subject property, the Respondent No.1 executed a freehold deed dated 06.10.2004 in favour of the Respondent No.5 with specific condition that the property shall be used only for residential purposes. Contrary to the same, the Respondent No.5 with the assistance of his power of attorney agent by name, Vinod Arora i.e., Respondent No.6, started raising illegal commercial construction on the subject property without obtaining any sanction/approval from the Respondent No.1. Though show cause notices were issued to him, he neither responded to the same nor took any steps against the illegal construction, which compelled the competent authority to pass the order of demolition of the illegal/unauthorized construction on the subject propert
Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana v. Inderjeet Singh
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council
Dr.G.N. Khajuria and others v. Delhi Development Authority and others
M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu
Esha Ekta Apartments Coop Housing Society Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai
Supertech Limited v. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association and others
Kerala State Costal Zone Management Authority vs. Maradu Municipality
Unauthorized constructions cannot be legitimized by time or inaction; strict enforcement of demolition orders is essential to uphold the rule of law.
Unauthorized constructions violating approved plans must be demolished; regularization is not an absolute right and must consider public interest and safety.
Unauthorized constructions cannot be legitimized without proper proof, and courts are mandated to enforce compliance strictly with planning laws.
Point of Law : Prevalent situation either in the limits of the Corporation, Municipality or the Panchayat if noticed, it would demonstrate clear apathy on the part of the Authorities towards the citi....
Municipal authorities must act promptly against unauthorized constructions, as they violate planning laws and undermine public interest.
Point of law: Giving false evidence by filing false affidavit is an evil which must be effectively curbed with a strong hand. Prosecution should be ordered when it is considered expedient in the inte....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.