Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Lakshman, B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, JJ
Prudhvi Life Sciences Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Alopi Shankar Tiwari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the specific performance claim and the underlying land sale dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. rival contentions regarding the maintainability of the plaint under order vii rule 11 cpc. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. scope and legal criteria for the court to reject a plaint under order vii rule 11 cpc. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. absence of valid cause of action due to lack of privity and authorization documents. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. corporate authorization and authentication of lawsuits by companies (curable defects). (Para 39 , 40 , 56 , 57) |
| 6. the necessity of a clear, enforceable contract and limitation constraints for specific performance. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)
1. Heard Mr. Hari Sreedhar, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. A. Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4, Mr. Wahed Khan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
