IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. Tukaramji, J
Mrs. Jaya Ben Patel – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural consolidation of interconnected criminal petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. summary of facts regarding cheque dishonour complaints. (Para 5 , 6) |
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? : Yes
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? : Yes
3. Whether His Lordship wishes to see the fair copy of the Judgment? : Yes
Counsel for the petitioners: Mr. A. Chandra Shaker, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Counsel for respondents: Mr. M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned
Assistant Public Prosecutor, appearing
for respondent No.1 -State.
Mr. Ravinder Sharma, learned counsel for
Respondent No.2.
Cases referred
1. 2013 SCC OnLine SC 522;
2. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 579;
3. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 579;
4. 2026 INSC 324 ; and
5. (2025) 7 SCC 623;
COMMON ORDER:
Since the legal issue arising for consideration in both Criminal Petitions is identical and substantially interconnected, both matters are being heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
Criminal Petition No.10115 of 2023
2. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of the proceedi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.