SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1818

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
KAMAL KALA – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND PRAVIDHIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD – Respondent
Writ Petition Service Single No. 910 of 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Lalit Sharma, Dushyant Mainali
For the Respondents: Mukesh Kapruwan, Rakesh Kunwar

Higher qualifications cannot be treated as equivalent to prescribed essential qualifications in the absence of a specific statutory rule or enabling provision in the recruitment advertisement, and such equivalence cannot be determined through judicial review.

Headnote:The case involves a challenge to the rejection of candidatures for the post of Vyavasthapak under an advertisement dated 08.02.2014, where the essential qualifications were a Bachelor's Degree and a Diploma in Catering and Hotel Management. The petitioners, who possessed Bachelor's Degrees in Hospitality and Hotel Administration but lacked the mandatory diploma, sought a writ of mandamus to be considered qualified on the grounds that their degree was a higher qualification than the required diploma. The primary issue is whether a higher qualification can be treated as equivalent to a prescribed essential qualification in the absence of an express enabling provision in the recruitment rules. The court held that the power of judicial review does not extend to declaring equivalence between qualifications, as this is a policy decision for the State Government as the employer. It reasoned that "the recruiting agency cannot broaden the eligibility criteria by treating a higher qualification as a replacement for the mandatory ‘essential’ qualification" unless specifically permitted by the rules. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education issued advertisement dated 08.02.2014, whereby applications were invited for appointment to various Group-C posts in different State Departments. Petitioner applied for the post of Vyavasthapak (Manager) in Government Estate Department. The essential qualification, required for appointment on the post of Vyavasthapak, are as follows:-

a) Bachelors Degree from a recognized University in India.

b) Diploma in Catering and Hotel Management from an institute recognized by the Government.

It is not in dispute that petitioners do not possess Diploma in Catering and Hotel Management. They instead possess Bachelors Degree in Hospitality and Hotel Administration from Indira Gandhi National Open University, except petitioner no. 4, who possesses Bachelors Degree in Hotel Management and Catering Technology from HNB Garhwal University and petitioner nos. 5 & 6, who possess Bachelors Degree in Hotel Management and Catering Technology from Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun. Candidature of the petitioners was rejected on the ground that they do not possess the essential qualification needed for appointment.

The relief sought in the writ petition is as follows:-

“i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to select the petitioners as Vyawasthapak considering them qualified for the post of Vyawasthapak.”

Petitioners contend that they possess a qualification, which is higher than Diploma, therefore, their claim for appointment could not have been rejected when a lower qualification makes a candidate eligible for appointment. It is further contended that the course content of Diploma and Degree courses is the same, inasmuch as whatever topics are included in the syllabus of diploma course are part of the curriculum for degree course, since students of degree course make an in-depth study of the subject, therefore, they are better suited for appointment as Vyavasthapak, thus, degree holders who possess higher degree cannot be held to be ineligible.

This Court do not find any scope for interference in the matter. It is well settled that while exercising power of judicial review, this Court cannot declare diploma as equivalent to degree or vice-versa. Whether qualification-A is to be treated as equivalent to qualification-B for appointment to a particular post can be decided by the State Government while framing Recruitment Rules and this Court cannot sit in judgment over the decision taken by State Government as employer.

In the present case, the Recruitment Rule is silent regarding Bachelors Degree and it recognizes only Diploma qualification. Decision regarding equivalence or otherwise of two different qualifications can be taken by subject experts only and there is nothing on record to show that Bachelors Degree possessed by petitioners was ever recognized as equivalent to Diploma in Hotel Management and Catering Technology.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Himakshi v. Rahul Verma and others , reported as 2026 SCC OnLine 642, while dealing with similar issue held as under:-

“26. The legal position regarding the impermissibility of substituting prescribed qualifications with higher degrees, in the absence of an express enabling provision, stands fortified in the judgment of this Court in Zahoor Ahmad Rather v. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad1, where it was held that in absence of a specific statutory rule or a provision in the advertisement, the recruiting agency cannot broaden the eligibility criteria by treating a higher qualification as a replacement for the mandatory ‘essential’ qualification’. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced for ready reference:—

“26. …it would not be permissible to draw an inference that a higher qualification necessarily presupposes the acquisition of another, albeit lower, qualification. The prescription of qualifica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top