SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1818

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KAMAL KALA – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND PRAVIDHIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI Writ Petition Service Single No. 910 of 2017

22 May, 2026 Kamal Kala & others --Petitioners Versus Uttarakhand Pravidhik Shiksha Parishad and another. --Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Lalit Sharma & Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocates for the petitioners.

Mr. Mukesh Kapruwan, Advocate for respondent no. 12.

Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no. 2.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education issued advertisement dated 08.02.2014, whereby applications were invited for appointment to various Group-C posts in different State Departments. Petitioner applied for the post of Vyavasthapak (Manager) in Government Estate Department. The essential qualification, required for appointment on the post of Vyavasthapak, are as follows:-

a) Bachelors Degree from a recognized University in India.

b) Diploma in Catering and Hotel Management from an institute recognized by the Government.

2. It is not in dispute that petitioners do not posses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top