Back
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J
Ganga Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's conviction under ipc section 304-a affirmed based on substantial evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defense failed to establish reasonable doubt regarding prosecution's case. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. eyewitness accounts and expert testimony corroborated each other, supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. reappraisal of factual findings must respect lower court decisions as long as they aren't perverse. (Para 14) |
| 5. sentence reduced from 1 year to 6 months considering applicant's age, circumstances, and prior trauma. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. Challenge in this revision is to the judgment dated 28.03.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No.2000018/2013 whereby learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Balod, District- Balod (CG) dismissed the criminal appeal of applicant and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.02.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Balod in Criminal Case No.150/2009 convicting applicant under Section 304-A of IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 1 year and to pay fine of Rs.500/-, and in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for 2 months.
2. Case of the prosecution in brief is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
