KASIM JAFAR SIDHIKI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1054 OF 2012
IN FAST/33067/2011
YAKUB AHEMAD SIDHIKI & ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Sontakke Gajanan K. & Mr.
P. G. Sontakke
AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 : Mr. R.B.Bagul
Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr.Arora Shyam C.
...
WITH
CA/1056/2012 IN FAST/33118/2011
WITH CA/1057/2012 IN FAST/33114/2011
WITH CA/1058/2012 IN FAST/33105/2011
CORAM : SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 6, 2018
O R D E R :
Heard learned counsel for applicants and
learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 3.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 3
objected these applications on the ground that poverty
and illiteracy cannot be a ground for condonation of
delay.
2
ca1054.12
3.
Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has
also opposed these applications for the same reason.
4.
In the present case, applicants who are the
original claimants in Land Reference cases have
sought condonation of delay of 233 days on the ground
that on account of poverty and financial crisis the
appeals could not preferred within time l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.