SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KASIM JAFAR SIDHIKI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SONTAKKE GAJANAN K AND P G SONTAKKE', 'G P', '', 'ARORA SHYAM C ADV']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1054 OF 2012

IN FAST/33067/2011

YAKUB AHEMAD SIDHIKI & ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Sontakke Gajanan K. & Mr.

P. G. Sontakke

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 : Mr. R.B.Bagul

Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr.Arora Shyam C.

...

WITH

CA/1056/2012 IN FAST/33118/2011

WITH CA/1057/2012 IN FAST/33114/2011

WITH CA/1058/2012 IN FAST/33105/2011

CORAM : SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 6, 2018

O R D E R :

Heard learned counsel for applicants and

learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 3.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 3

objected these applications on the ground that poverty

and illiteracy cannot be a ground for condonation of

delay.

2

ca1054.12

3.

Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has

also opposed these applications for the same reason.

4.

In the present case, applicants who are the

original claimants in Land Reference cases have

sought condonation of delay of 233 days on the ground

that on account of poverty and financial crisis the

appeals could not preferred within time l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top