BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Sandipkumar C. More, J
Sandip s/o Babasaheb Dahiphale – Appellant
Versus
Sow. Ashwini Sandip Dahiphale – Respondent
1 The appellants, who are original respondents in Civil Misc. Application No. 05 of 2022, have challenged the order dated 16.08.2022, passed by the learned District Judge-2, Newasa, District Ahmednagar, (hereinafter referred to as “the learned trial Court”) in the aforesaid application whereby custody of present appellant no.4-Arohi is directed to be given to present Respondent i.e. original applicant.
2 The background facts are as under:
Appellant no.1 and Respondent are husband and wife, whereas, appellant no.4 is their daughter, presently aged about two and half years. Appellants no.2 and 3 are the parents of appellant no.1 and in-laws of Respondent-wife.
3 According to the Respondent-wife, she gave birth to Arohi on 20.08.2020. Since it was a female child, appellants no.1 to 3 started harassing her on getting dejected. They were also demanding amount of Rs.7 lakhs for construction of their house and ultimately on 13.12.2021, they drove the Respondent out of {3} their house by snatching Arohi from her. The Respondent-wife, therefore, fled application under Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for getting custody of Arohi, but the same was rejected by the concerned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.