ORISSA HIGH COURT
HEMALATA NAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
2 13.12.2018
Heard Mr. A. Das, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. B. Senapati, learned Additional
Government Advocate .
The petitioner has filed the writ petition to quash
the advertisement No.637/2018 dated 20.11.2018
issued by opposite party no.5-CDPO, Kashipur,
Kashipur ICDS Project for engagement of Anganwadi
Worker in respect of Siadimal Anganwadi Centre.
Mr. A. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner
contended that the petitioner has preferred appeal
bearing Anganwadi Appeal No.1 of 2018 before the
Additional District Magistrate, Rayagada which is
pending for consideration. When the matter is
subjudiced before the learned Additional District
Magistrate, Rayagada and the matter was adjourned to
07.12.2018 on which date due non-availability of
CDPO, Kashipur, it has been posted to 18.12.2019 for
hearing, the CDPO, Kashipur has issued fresh
advertisement for filling up the vacancy of Anganwadi
Worker in respect of Siadimal Anganwadi Centre. He
further contended that when the matter is subjudiced
before the appellate authority, issuance of fresh
advertisement
by
the
CDPO,
Kashipur
causes
prejudice to the petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.