SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SANJAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP-5757-2021

Date of Decision: 05.10.2021

SANJAY

…Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

…Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present :

Mr. AbhimanyuBatra, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

Petition herein is for issuance of a writ in the nature of

mandamus directing the respondents to declare the result of the petitioner for

the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) or in the alternate to disclose the actual

marks scored by him in the Examination.

2.

Pursuant to order dated 24.08.2021, the result of the petitioner

has been received in a sealed cover, which has been opened during the Court

proceedings. The same reveals that he has secured an aggregate of 56 marks

(51 marks in the written examination + 05 marks towards socio-economic

criteria).

3.

In the premise, it seems that being unaware of his actual result,

the petitioner was misled into filing the instant petition premised on an

understanding that he had obtained 53 marks in the written examination, and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top