SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAVI SHANKAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Sr. No.235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP-14643-2020

Date of decision: 02.05.2022

Ravi Shankar and others

…Petitioners

Vs.

State of Haryana and another

…Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr.VikramSheoran, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr. R.K.S.Brar, Additional A.G., Haryana.

***

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

Petitioners herein,inter alia, seek issuance of a writ in the nature

of certiorari to quash the impugned final result dated 03.09.2020

(AnnexureP-6) to the extent of non-granting of 5 marks as per Socio

Economic Criteria and not selecting the petitioners on the post of Clerk.

Learned State counsel, at the outset, points out that the result for

the post of Clerk advertised vide advertisement No.5/2019, (Annexure P-1)

impugned herein, has been quashed vide order dated 25.04.2022 passed in

CWP No.15672-2021 titled as “Amit Kumar and others Vs. State of

Haryana and others.” wherein it has been directed that the Commission shall

carry out re-evaluation of all the candidates across board who had

participated in the selection process and declare their result and pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top