SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINIT0AL

Writ Petition No.1465 of 2020 (S/S)

Rajendra Singh and Others

..…Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

…Respondents

Advocate: Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. P.C. Bisht, Addl. C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

The petitioners to the present writ petition have come up with the

case that after working with the respondents as a regular Collection Amin, they

have attained their respective age of superannuation on 31.12.2018, 30.06.2019

and 31.12.2019 respectively. They have contended; that since having worked as

Collection Amin, where there was no further promotional avenues available to

the petitioners, their rights were protected by the Government Order of

17.10.2008 and accordingly by the order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate dated

18.05.2020 in fact, the grade pay, which was made payable to the petitioners,

was settled and approved as to be fixed on Rs.5400/- grade pay, with the pay

scale of Rs.15600-24800, and accordingly their retiral benefits payable to them

were determined based on the order of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top