ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SATYENDRA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2776 of 2022
Revisionist :- Satyendra Yadav
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Radhey Shyam Shukla,Vipul Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manoj Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, learned
counsel for O.P. No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the
record.
This revisionist under section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the
impugned order dated 27.5.2022 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge,
Court No . 42, Shahjahanpur in S.T. No. 616 of 2018 (State Vs. Sanu
Gupta and others), in Case Crime No. 1091 of 2016, under section 307/34
IPC, P.S.Khutar, District Shahjahanpur.
On perusal of the record, the Court finds that there is no legal infirmity in
the order impugned, which may call for any interference by this Court in
exercise of powers conferred under revisional jurisdiction, therefore, the
prayer to quash the impugned order and the consequential proceeding is
rejected.
At this stage, the learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the
revisionist has so far not been arrested in the above case and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.