Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J
Manirul Haque @ Sk. Mantu – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the incident leading to conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's argument citing errors in lower court judgments. (Para 11) |
| 3. need for credible evidence and proper investigation procedures. (Para 20 , 23) |
| 4. final judgment declaring the conviction set aside. (Para 24) |
1. The instant criminal revisional application is filed by the petitioner being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20th May, 2013 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court at Suri, Birbhum in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2008 affirming the judgment and order dated 29th November, 2007 passed by the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge at Bolpur, Birbhum in Sessions Case No. 190 of 2006, corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 6 dated 23rd November, 2006 convicting the petitioner under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing him to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default simple imprisonment for another two months.
2. The prosecution case precisely stated on 3rd June, 2005 at about 8 PM, the victim lady namely, Unnati Das, a house-wife, proceeded to her elder broth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.