K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,DIPAK MISRA
MATHAI SAMUEL – Appellant
Versus
EAPEN EAPEN (DEAD) BY LRS. . – Respondent
Page 1
JUDGMENT
1
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL
APPEAL
NO.
8197
OF
2012
[Arising out of SLP (Civil) NO.13385 OF 2009]
Mathai Samuel & Ors.
.. Appellant(s)
Versus
Eapen Eapen (dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
.. Respondent(s)
J U D G M
E N T
K.
S.
Radhakrishnan,
J.
1.
Leave granted.
2.
We are, in this appeal, called upon to determine the question
whether the recitals in exhibit A1 concerning item No.1 of schedule
No. 8 therein (item No. 1 of the plaint schedule) discloses a
Page 2
JUDGMENT
2
testamentary disposition or a settlement creating vested rights in
favour of the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 1 to 3 though possession
and enjoyment stood deferred until the death of the executants.
3.
O.S. No. 169 of 1990 was instituted before the court of
Subordinate Judge, Thiruvalla by the original plaintiffs and one
Eapen for partition and separate possession of various items of
properties, of which, we are in this appeal concerned only with item
No. 1 of the plaint schedule. The trial court passed a preliminary
decree giving various directions, however with regard to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.